Mazda 6 2002 vs Volvo V70 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 39 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.1 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 2002 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1712 litres | 1641 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V70. The Volvo V70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 71 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`905 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Volvo V70 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Volvo V70 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |