Mazda 6 2002 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 165 NM | 165 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
780 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 6 2002 1.8 engine: The engine often has an unstable idle speed. The thermostat, cooling pump, and alternator are weak points. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1712 litres | 1700 litres | |
Mazda 6 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 12 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |