Mazda 6 2002 vs Fiat Stilo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, but torque is 3 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 6 2002 1.8 engine: The engine often has an unstable idle speed. The thermostat, cooling pump, and alternator are weak points. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger, but lower. Mazda 6 is 17 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1712 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |