Mazda 6 2005 vs Mazda 6 2006
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 2005 engine produces 94 HP less power than Mazda 6 2006, whereas torque is 173 NM less than Mazda 6 2006. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 2005 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2006, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2005 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 2005 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Tribute | Used also on Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 6 2005 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. Mazda 6 2006 2.3 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its capacity is quite limited. The engine also requires high quality fuel and tends to use more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 6 2005 is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2006, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 2005 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1712 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 2005 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 2005 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2006. The Mazda 6 2006 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2005 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2006, which means Mazda 6 2005 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |