Mazda 6 2005 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo V50. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 20 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1712 litres | 1307 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 88 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V50, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |