Mazda 6 2005 vs Honda Accord 2005

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Honda Accord
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP155 HP
Torque: 165 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 35 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway950 km on highway
770 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years11 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Accord might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.75 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres572 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1712 litres1657 litres
Mazda 6 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 55 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9252`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 9.1/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv