Mazda 6 2008 vs Skoda Octavia 2009

 
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Skoda Octavia
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 170 HP140 HP
Torque: 226 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds9.7 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, but torque is 94 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.25.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 375 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1140 km on highway
730 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.57 m
Width: 1.80 m1.77 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 14 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres580 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litres1630 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 121 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`010
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Octavia, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 30004600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv