Mazda 6 2008 vs Skoda Octavia 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 2008 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 6 is 14 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | 1630 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 121 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Octavia, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |