Mazda 6 2010 vs Subaru Outback 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 3 HP more power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 3 NM less than Subaru Outback. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.4 | |
| Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 526 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 7 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |