Mazda 6 2010 vs Ford Focus 2011

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Ford Focus
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP150 HP
Torque: 226 NMn/a NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 6 engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Focus.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.16.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1100 km on highway
730 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.56 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.49 m1.51 m
Mazda 6 is 23 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres476 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Focus.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`900
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42004600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Focus has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv