Mazda 6 2010 vs Subaru Outback 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 4 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 131 NM more than Subaru Outback. Despite less power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 526 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 7 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`145 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |