Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 6 2009

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Mazda 6
2009 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 163 HP163 HP
Torque: 360 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.2 seconds
Mazda 6 2010 and Mazda 6 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.6 l/100km
By specification Mazda 6 2010 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2009, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1330 km on highway
960 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years5 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.71 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.49 m1.44 m
Mazda 6 2010 is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 6 2009, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 2010 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litres1751 litres
Mazda 6 2010 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2009.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2009, which means Mazda 6 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1452`135
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 42003000
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv