Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 6 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 2010 engine produces 34 HP less power than Mazda 6 2009, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mazda 6 2009. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 2010 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2009, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2010 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 6 2010 is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 6 2009, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 2010 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | 1751 litres | |
| Mazda 6 2010 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2009. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2009, which means Mazda 6 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`135 | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |