Mazda 6 2013 vs Volvo V70 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 48 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Volvo V70. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |