Mazda 6 2013 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Mazda 6
2013 - 2015
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 192 HP192 HP
Torque: 256 NM256 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds7.8 seconds
Mazda 6 2013 and Mazda 6 2012 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 6 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km8.0 l/100km
By specification Mazda 6 2013 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2013 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1240 km on highway
770 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years12 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2013 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 2013 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres489 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 2013 has 13 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2012. The Mazda 6 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2013 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2012, which means Mazda 6 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`040no data
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 66007000
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv