Mazda 6 2013 vs Volvo V70 2011

 
Mazda 6
2013 - 2015
Volvo V70
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP163 HP
Torque: 380 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V70. Despite less power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1400 km in combined cycle1340 km in combined cycle
1630 km on highway1550 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption1090 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.82 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.55 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres575 litres
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`180
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 74007200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Volvo V70 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv