Mazda 6 2013 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Mazda 6
2013 - 2015
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.2 seconds
Mazda 6 2013 and Mazda 6 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.4
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1400 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
1630 km on highway1630 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2013 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres522 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1664 litres
Mazda 6 2013 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6 2015.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2013 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2015, which means Mazda 6 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`090 kg2`090 kg
Net weight:1`420 kg1`485 kg
Load capacity:670 kg605 kg
Mazda 6 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Mazda 6 2015. Therefore, Mazda 6 2013 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 60008400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv