Mazda 6 2013 vs Honda Accord 2011

 
Mazda 6
2013 - 2015
Honda Accord
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.2 seconds
Mazda 6 and Honda Accord have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 30 NM more than Honda Accord.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1400 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1630 km on highway1410 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption1060 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.75 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 5 cm longer than the Honda Accord, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres406 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1183 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 96 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Accord.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`100
Safety: no data
Quality:Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 70006400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Honda Accord has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv