Mazda 6 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014

 
Mazda 6
2013 - 2015
Volkswagen Passat
2014 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds8.9 seconds
Mazda 6 and Volkswagen Passat have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1400 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
1630 km on highway1530 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption1060 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.77 m
Width: 1.84 m1.83 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres650 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 148 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`130
Safety:
Volkswagen Passat is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Passat, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 580013 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv