Mazda 6 2013 vs Hyundai i40 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 9 HP more power than Hyundai i40, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Hyundai i40. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i40, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1630 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i40 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i40 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai i40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1672 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.94 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.86 metres more than that of the Hyundai i40, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`539 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 670 kg | 611 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Hyundai i40. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i40 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Hyundai i40 has
| |