Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo V70 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 95 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.1 | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 575 litres | |
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`180 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6400 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |