Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo V70 2011

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Volvo V70
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 145 HP240 HP
Torque: 210 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds7.7 seconds
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 95 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.68.1
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1090 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.82 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.55 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres575 litres
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9802`180
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 64006000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Volvo V70 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv