Mazda 6 2013 vs Volvo V60 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 6 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 17 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V60 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V60 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |