Mazda 6 2013 vs Volvo V70 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.1 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 6 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |