Mazda 6 2013 vs Volkswagen Golf 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, but torque is 110 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 6 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 6 is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 605 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 103 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |