Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 3 2004

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Mazda 3
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 166 HP160 HP
Torque: 207 NM203 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 6 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.1no data
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres55 litres

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years16 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda Tribute
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.49 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 18 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data878 litres
Mazda 6 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`890no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Mazda 3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • higher ratings in user reviews
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv