Mazda 6 2002 vs Citroen C5 2001

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Citroen C5
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP136 HP
Torque: 310 NM317 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds11.2 seconds
Mazda 6 and Citroen C5 have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 7 NM less than Citroen C5. Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.8 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1150 km on highway
920 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.62 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.44 m1.48 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 492 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters12.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`100
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C5, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Citroen C5 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv