Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 6 2005

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 141 HP147 HP
Torque: 181 NM184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 6 2002 engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda 6 2005, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Mazda 6 2005.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 2002 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2002 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway1010 km on highway
760 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)130 mm (5.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years13 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.69 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2002 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres492 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1662 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8551`885
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv