Mazda 6 2002 vs Ford Mondeo 2000

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Ford Mondeo
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 141 HP125 HP
Torque: 181 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10.9 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 16 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.57.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway1010 km on highway
760 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km500'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Used also on Ford Focus
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.73 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1370 litres
Mazda 6 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8551`875
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv