Mazda 6 2002 vs BMW 5 series 2003

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
BMW 5 series
2003 - 2005
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 141 HP170 HP
Torque: 181 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 29 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 29 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.59.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km9.7 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway1020 km on highway
760 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z4, BMW Z3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.84 m
Width: 1.78 m1.85 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres520 litres
BMW 5 series has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 28 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8552`025
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 10004600
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv