Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 6 2005

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 141 HP147 HP
Torque: 181 NM184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds10.9 seconds
Mazda 6 2005 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 2002 engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda 6 2005, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Mazda 6 2005. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.88.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km9.6 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2002 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Mazda 6 2002 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2002 could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 2002 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway960 km on highway
720 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)130 mm (5.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km430'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Used also on Mazda 5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 2002 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.69 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2002 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres492 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1662 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8801`915
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv