Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 6 2005

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP120 HP
Torque: 165 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds11 seconds
Mazda 6 2002 and Mazda 6 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km8.3 l/100km
By specification Mazda 6 2002 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2002 could require 75 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 2002 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1060 km on highway
780 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)130 mm (5.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years10 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.69 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2002 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres492 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1662 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`870
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv