Mazda 6 2005 vs Mazda 6 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 2005 engine produces 94 HP less power than Mazda 6 2006, whereas torque is 173 NM less than Mazda 6 2006. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 2005 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2006, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2005 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 2005 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Tribute | Used also on Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 6 2005 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. Mazda 6 2006 2.3 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its capacity is quite limited. The engine also requires high quality fuel and tends to use more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2005 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 492 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1662 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 2005 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 2005 has 37 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2006. The Mazda 6 2006 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2005 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2006, which means Mazda 6 2005 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |