Mazda 6 2005 vs Fiat Croma 2005

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Fiat Croma
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 147 HP147 HP
Torque: 184 NM203 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10.7 seconds
Mazda 6 and Fiat Croma have the same engine power, but Mazda 6 torque is 19 NM less than Fiat Croma. Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.09.7
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway790 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2005 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.76 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.60 m
Mazda 6 is 7 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1662 litresno data
Mazda 6 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Croma.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8852`000
Safety:
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 16002600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Fiat Croma has
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv