Mazda 6 2005 vs Opel Signum 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 121 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Mazda 6 engine produces 29 HP less power than Opel Signum, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Signum, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Signum. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Signum might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Opel Signum engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 4 cm longer than the Opel Signum, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 492 litres | 365 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1662 litres | 1410 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 127 litres more trunk space than the Opel Signum. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 252 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Signum, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Signum, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Opel Signum has
| |