Mazda 6 2005 vs Mercedes C class 2000

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Mercedes C class
2000 - 2004
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.1 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 121 HP115 HP
Torque: 320 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds12.1 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Mercedes C class is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1340 km on highway
960 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 5 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda 5Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes Vito
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes C class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.53 m
Width: 1.78 m1.73 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 16 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 492 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1662 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0151`500
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes C class, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
Mercedes C klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv