Mazda 6 2005 vs Mercedes C class 2002

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Mercedes C class
2002 - 2004
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP143 HP
Torque: 165 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.7 seconds
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 23 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.88.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway980 km on highway
770 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes C class engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years13 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes C class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.53 m
Width: 1.78 m1.73 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 16 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 492 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1662 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`500
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes C class, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16001600
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mercedes C klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv