Mazda 6 2008 vs Renault Laguna 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 184 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 7 HP more power than Renault Laguna, but torque is 11 NM less than Renault Laguna. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Renault Laguna engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Mazda 6 2008 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 6 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | no data | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`919 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |