Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 6 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 2010 engine produces 22 HP less power than Mazda 6 2008, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 6 2008. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.6 | |
| Mazda 6 2010 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2008, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2010 and Mazda 6 2008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2010 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2008, which means Mazda 6 2010 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |