Mazda 6 2010 vs Fiat Croma 2008

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Fiat Croma
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP150 HP
Torque: 360 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP more power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Fiat Croma. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1100 km on highway
960 km with real consumption820 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.78 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.60 m
Mazda 6 is 3 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1702 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma.
Gross weight: 2`110 kg2`060 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 40002200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Fiat Croma has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv