Mazda 6 2010 vs Honda Accord 2008

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Honda Accord
2008 - 2011
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 129 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds9.6 seconds
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 21 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.2 l/100km
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1230 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1320 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption1040 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Honda Accord 2008 2.2 engine: The Honda N22B diesel is generally considered a successful and durable engine. Its main weak points are connected with the fuel system, emissions components, cold-weather operation, and several intake and exhaust-related parts. One of the most frequent complaints concerns the injectors. Depending on the version, owners report problems with sensitive piezo injectors, while Bosch injectors themselves are usually ...  More about Honda Accord 2008 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.73 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres467 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1702 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord.
Gross weight: 2`100 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 32003200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Honda Accord has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv