Mazda 6 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Ford Mondeo
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 129 HP200 HP
Torque: 340 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds7.9 seconds
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 71 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.26.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1230 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1400 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.78 m
Width: 1.80 m1.89 m
Height: 1.44 m1.50 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres486 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1390 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 312 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1002`210
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv