Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo V70 2011

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Volvo V70
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 175 HP163 HP
Torque: 420 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 12 HP more power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo V70. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.65.2
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1340 km in combined cycle1340 km in combined cycle
1550 km on highway1550 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.82 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.55 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres575 litres
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`180
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 58006200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V70 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv