Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo V60 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V60, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.4 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 17 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V60 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |