Mazda 6 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2010
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 48 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.8 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 14 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |