Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 2010 engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda 6 2012, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 6 2012. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 3.9 | |
|
The Mazda 6 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 2010 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2010 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1820 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mazda 6 2010 is smaller. Mazda 6 2010 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2012, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 2010 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 2010 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 2010 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2012. The Mazda 6 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2010 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2012, which means Mazda 6 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |