Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 6 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 193 NM | 184 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Mazda 6 2010 engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda 6 2008, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Mazda 6 2008. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.8 | |
Mazda 6 2010 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2008, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Mazda 6 2008 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 6 2010 is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 6 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 2010 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 505 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | 1751 litres | |
Mazda 6 2010 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2008. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2008, which means Mazda 6 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |