Mazda 6 2010 vs Ford Focus 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 193 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Focus. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.4 | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1751 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |