Mazda 6 2010 vs Audi A4 2008

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Audi A4
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 155 HP180 HP
Torque: 193 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds8.6 seconds
Audi A4 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 25 HP less power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Audi A4. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.3
The Audi A4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway1100 km on highway
Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.70 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.49 m1.44 m
Mazda 6 is 9 cm longer than the Audi A4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres490 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi A4, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0302`095
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Audi A4 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Audi A4 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 42006200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A4 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv