Mazda 6 2008 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mazda 6 2008 engine produces 11 HP more power than Mazda 6 2010, but torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 6 2010. Despite the higher power, Mazda 6 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.2 | |
|
The Mazda 6 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 2008 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2008 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2008 and Mazda 6 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2008 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2010, which means Mazda 6 2008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |