Mazda 6 2008 vs Mazda 6 2010

 
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 185 HP129 HP
Torque: 400 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 6 2008 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 2008 engine produces 56 HP more power than Mazda 6 2010, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Mazda 6 2010. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.65.2
The Mazda 6 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2008 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2008 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1230 km in combined cycle
1360 km on highway1450 km on highway
Mazda 6 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.76 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2008 and Mazda 6 2010 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1702 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2008 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2010, which means Mazda 6 2008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1102`100
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 32004200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv